African Multidisciplinary Scholarship Journal (AMSJ) AFRICAN MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCHOLARSHIP JOURNALAdvancing Knowledge. Inspiring Transformation.
Research ArticleOpen Access

Resource-Based Theory (RBT): A Human Resource Perspective on Firm Performance

Agnes Wayua KyaloiD 0009-0007-9619-5453
School of Business and Economics, Daystar University, Kenya
Charles Katua KithandiiD 0000-0003-3495-9220
School of Business and Economics, Daystar University, Kenya
African Multidisciplinary Scholarship Journal • Vol. 1 • No. 1 • 2026 • Pages 135-147
Published: 2026-10-15 • DOI: 10.59413/amsj/v1.i1.11
Read HTML Full TextDownload PDFCite This Article

Abstract

Resource-Based Theory (RBT) holds that firms achieve and sustain competitive advantage not primarily through their position in product markets but through the possession and deployment of internal resources that are valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN). Although RBT originated in the strategic management literature, its most enduring and generative application has been to the firm's human resources. This article examines RBT as a theoretical foundation for understanding how human resource management (HRM) contributes to sustainable firm performance. It traces the theory's intellectual origins from Penrose's theory of the growth of the firm, through Wernerfelt's resource-based view, to Barney's VRIN framework, before turning to the strategic human resource management (SHRM) literature that appropriated and extended RBT notably Wright and McMahan's theoretical perspectives on SHRM, Lado and Wilson's competency-based view, and the human-capital and social-capital extensions that followed. Building on this foundation, the article develops an integrative conceptual model that links HR systems, VRIN human-resource capital, and collective employee behaviour to firm performance through the mediating logic captured in the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) framework, and it advances five research propositions. The article also engages critically with the tautology, causal-ambiguity, and context-dependence critiques levelled at RBT, and considers complementary institutional and dynamic-capability perspectives that address RBT's static bias. It concludes with implications for strategic HRM practice and directions for future empirical research, arguing that human resources, properly configured, remain among the most defensible sources of sustained competitive advantage available to the modern firm.

Keywords

Resource-Based TheoryStrategic Human Resource ManagementVRINHuman CapitalSustained Competitive AdvantageFirm PerformanceAMO Framework

References

  1. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1),33–46.
  2. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
  3. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  4. Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61.
  5. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? Journal of
  6. Management, 32(6), 898–925.
  7. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Columbia
  8. University Press.
  9. Boxall, P. (1996). The strategic HRM debate and the resource-based view of the firm. Human Resource Management
  10. Journal, 6(3), 59–75.
  11. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and human resource management. Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Coff, R. W. (1997). Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based
  13. theory. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 374–402.
  14. Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human
  15. resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 341–358.
  16. Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis
  17. of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501–528.
  18. Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of
  19. the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443–456.
  20. Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic,
  21. contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835.
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11),
  23. 1105–1121.
  24. Godfrey, P. C., & Hill, C. W. L. (1995). The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic
  25. Management Journal, 16(7), 519–533.
  26. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation.
  27. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
  28. Guest, D. E. (1997). Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda. International
  29. Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3), 263–276.
  30. Guest, D. E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource
  31. Management Journal, 21(1), 3–13.
  32. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate
  33. financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.
  34. Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques.
  35. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372.
  36. Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based
  37. perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699–727.
  38. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and
  39. development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.
  40. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of
  41. Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
  42. Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management
  43. Studies, 46(1), 129–142.
  44. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell.
  45. Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Harvard Business
  46. School Press.
  47. Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business School Press.
  48. Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of
  49. Management Review, 36(1), 127–150.
  50. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
  51. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?
  52. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40.
  53. Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory,
  54. analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(1), 3–20.
  55. Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage.
  56. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.
  57. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management
  58. Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
  59. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
  60. Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of
  61. Management, 27(6), 701–721.
  62. Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of
  63. Management, 18(2), 295–320.
  64. Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A
  65. resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301–326.
  66. Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis.
  67. In J. Paauwe, D. E. Guest, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 97– 110). Wiley.

How to cite

Agnes Wayua Kyalo Charles Katua Kithandi (2026). Resource-Based Theory (RBT): A Human Resource Perspective on Firm Performance. African Multidisciplinary Scholarship Journal, 1(1), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.59413/amsj/v1.i1.11